CRC Meeting #4 Minutes (12/12/23)

Notes

• Part time faculty, please submit timesheets (paper or electronic) today or ASAP
• Agenda and Minutes will be in this GoogleDrive folder and posted to the English DepartmentWebsite 

Feedback on Composition Sequence Statement

• A bit less verbose
• Emphasize the relationship between the courses
• Integrate some materials concerning the role of research and secondary materials in the 
• Should this be more optimistic, aspirational, less dogmatic. 

Composition Website:

• Rob – it might make sense to add the pathways outcomes against our program outcomes. We’re supposed to have both sets on our syllabi. 
• Emily: Is the syllabus for the student or to satisfy a bureaucratic need? 
• Rob: The document should “live” on the Comp Site.
• Our decision to link the pathways outcomes (instead of listing them) should be our own. 

Discussion of the Sequence Statement, Course Description, and Course Learning Outcomes

• Megan – these documents do different things for different people. Not every piece needs to do everything. 

Vote Count

Revised Course Learning Outcomes: Approved 

Approve: 15

Reject: 0

Abstain: 1

Revised ENG 2400 Course Description: Approved

Approve: 16

Reject: 0

Abstain: 0 

Discussion of spring CRC

• Possibility for Multiple Sub-Committees to focus on different things